Justice Mei returned home, became a supporter of Mao and worked as a legal bureaucrat. Later he became a victim of the Great Cultural Revolution. Justice Zaryanov remained a loyal subordinate of Stalin. He was expelled from the Communist Party after Stalin’s death and deprived of his military rank.
不可思议的历史现场感，但基本只呈现法官之间的理念冲突，也许日本人难以直视检方和辩护人对决？至于法律哲学的争论，我难以想象，如果不以纽伦堡审判原则处理二战历史，仅靠空洞的法律程序正义，那侵略战争导致的灾难岂不是就视作一场普通历史叙事？就像联合国安理会设常任理事国（拥有一票否决权），虽然有缺陷，难道不比国联更有力保障和平？（另外没有想到剧里还涉及了裕仁责任，我以为会回避）
讨论很有意思
印度人欠抽
Justice Mei returned home, became a supporter of Mao and worked as a legal bureaucrat. Later he became a victim of the Great Cultural Revolution. Justice Zaryanov remained a loyal subordinate of Stalin. He was expelled from the Communist Party after Stalin’s death and deprived of his military rank.
我以为人类最根源的问题是：「发动战争犯下残酷罪行的人应该要如何负起相应的责任」，所以NHK制作的这部片虽然精良，但是并不适合我。价值观问题本来只有一颗星，但加一颗星给提及天皇责任。
啥玩意